MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402896741 · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005823

ESGO/EURACAN/GCIG guidelines for the management of patients with uterine sarcomas

2024· article· en· W4402896741 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Ray‐Coquard, Paolo G. Casali, Sabrina Croce, Fiona M. Fennessy, D. Fischerová, Robin L. Jones, Roberta Sanfilippo, Ignacio Zapardiel, Frédéric Amant, Jean‐Yves Blay, Javier Martín‐Broto, Antonio Casado, Sarah Chiang, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Rick L. M. Haas, Martee L. Hensley, Peter Hohenberger, Jae‐Weon Kim, Se Ik Kim, Mehmet Mutlu Meydanlı, Patricia Pautier, Jalid Sehouli, Winan J. van Houdt, François Planchamp, Michael Friedländer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersBayer VitalChugai PharmaceuticalGenentechPharmaMarEisaiEuropean Network for Rare Adult Solid CancersBeiGeneArog PharmaceuticalsNovocureSanofi-Aventis DeutschlandPfizerIntuitive SurgicalKaryopharm TherapeuticsGilead SciencesSymphogenBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyAstraZenecaFoghorn TherapeuticsDaiichi Sankyo EuropeIterion TherapeuticsSanofiAmgen
KeywordsMedicineGeneral surgeryGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A collaboration was established between the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers (EURACAN), and the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) with the aim of developing clinically relevant, evidence-based consensus guidelines on the management of patients with uterine sarcomas from diagnosis to relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological CancerSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207