MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

OAVS: Efficient Online Learning of Streaming Policies for Drone-sourced Live Video Analytics

2024· article· en· W4402896990 on OpenAlexaff
Zekai Li, Miao Zhang, Yifei Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDroneComputer scienceAnalyticsVideo streamingOnline videoMultimediaOnline learningHuman–computer interactionData scienceReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drone-sourced live video analytics has extensive applications across diverse domains. Adaptive video streaming is a pivotal technique in these applications that targets at effectively delivering video content to servers under varying network conditions, enabling complex analytics afterward. However, our thorough data analysis reveals that conventional offline video streaming policies cannot effectively adapt to highly fluctuating drone network environments and dynamic changes in aerial view scenes. This results in suboptimal analytic performance and necessitates online adaptation for policy models. Yet, obtaining ground-truth analytics results directly from drones is infeasible due to their limited capacity. Furthermore, naively streaming original videos to the server for online adaption is greatly challenged by the scarce and dynamic networks, leading to decreased accuracy performance and escalated transmission cost if not properly designed. In this paper, we present OAVS, a novel online learning-enabled adaptive streaming framework for drone-sourced video analytics. To facilitate cost-effective online retraining, we design a hierarchical reinforcement learning approach in which the upper-level module intelligently determines the timing for online retraining, balancing machine-perceived quality of experience (QoE) improvement and transmission cost. Meanwhile, the lower-level module dynamically allocates bitrate to maximize machine-perceived QoE. Extensive experiments based on real-world drone video and aerial network datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework achieves a 17.7% mean accuracy increase, a 37.5% decrease in the mean failure rate of video uploading, and a 5.2% mean latency decrease compared to state-of-the-art solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207