MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TASRI: Toward Traffic-Aware, Sustainable and Reliable ISL Provisioning for LEO Satellite Constellation Networking

2024· article· en· W4402897343 on OpenAlexaff
Long Chen, Yi Ching Chou, Dandan Wang, Feng Wang, Haoyuan Zhao, Hao Fang, Sami Ma, Feilong Tang, Linghe Kong, Jiangchuan Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsProvisioningConstellationSatellite constellationComputer scienceComputer networkSatelliteCommunications satelliteTelecommunicationsEngineeringAerospace engineeringAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inter-Satellite Links (ISLs) are key for worldwide communication and efficient use of space networks in the future 6G network. However, they face challenges in sustainability and reliability. Reducing ISLs saves energy and extends battery life, which is critical since satellite batteries are hard to replace. More ISLs, however, can make the system more reliable but at the cost of higher energy use, especially problematic when traffic is uneven, speeding up battery wear. To tackle this dilemma, we for the first time develop a Traffic-Aware, Sustainable and Reliable ISL provisioning (TASRI) framework for LEO satellite constellation networks. In TASRI, ISLs can be flexibly switched on and off to better accommodate various traffic conditions as well as reliability and sustainability. We formulate the ISL provisioning problem based on the sustainability-oriented weight model and then propose an on-demand topology evolving algorithm. Extensive real-world deployment-based simulation results show that, compared to the state-of-the-art, our TASRI can substantially reduce battery life consumption, while achieving comparable reliability with considerably fewer ISLs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207