TASRI: Toward Traffic-Aware, Sustainable and Reliable ISL Provisioning for LEO Satellite Constellation Networking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inter-Satellite Links (ISLs) are key for worldwide communication and efficient use of space networks in the future 6G network. However, they face challenges in sustainability and reliability. Reducing ISLs saves energy and extends battery life, which is critical since satellite batteries are hard to replace. More ISLs, however, can make the system more reliable but at the cost of higher energy use, especially problematic when traffic is uneven, speeding up battery wear. To tackle this dilemma, we for the first time develop a Traffic-Aware, Sustainable and Reliable ISL provisioning (TASRI) framework for LEO satellite constellation networks. In TASRI, ISLs can be flexibly switched on and off to better accommodate various traffic conditions as well as reliability and sustainability. We formulate the ISL provisioning problem based on the sustainability-oriented weight model and then propose an on-demand topology evolving algorithm. Extensive real-world deployment-based simulation results show that, compared to the state-of-the-art, our TASRI can substantially reduce battery life consumption, while achieving comparable reliability with considerably fewer ISLs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".