The Central Role of the Citric Acid Cycle in Energy Metabolism: From Metabolic Intermediates to Regulatory Mechanisms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The citric acid cycle (TCA) plays a crucial central role in cellular energy metabolism by linking the breakdown of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, thereby promoting the generation of ATP and maintaining cellular energy homeostasis. This study systematically explores the metabolic intermediates of the citric acid cycle and its complex regulatory mechanisms, revealing its multifaceted functions in energy metabolism, cellular signaling, and biosynthesis. The results indicate that the citric acid cycle is not only vital for energy production but also directly participates in various biosynthetic pathways within the cell by providing precursors for amino acids, fatty acids, and other essential biomolecules. Additionally, the intermediates of the citric acid cycle play important roles in regulating immune responses, mitophagy, cellular stress responses, and metabolic reprogramming, contributing to cellular stability in response to environmental changes. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms of metabolic disorders and disease development, offering a theoretical basis for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. By gaining an in-depth understanding of the multi-layered regulatory mechanisms of the citric acid cycle, this study will advance scientific studies and practical applications in related fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".