Repenser la paix et la sécurité : le multilatéralisme onusien face au genre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce numéro spécial propose un regard empirique et contextualisé sur les réceptions du genre, en tant qu’enjeu transnational, norme globale et catégorie d’action, par les acteurs et actrices du multilatéralisme sur la paix et la sécurité internationales. Les quatre articles rassemblés dans le numéro invitent à croiser la sociologie des relations internationales, la théorie des narratifs stratégiques, les études féministes et la sociologie des mobilisations. Ils ont en commun un fort ancrage empirique – s’appuyant sur l’importante littérature grise des organisations internationales et sur des enquêtes de terrain –, leur goût pour le dialogue entre différentes littératures et l’emploi de méthodes variées empruntées à l’ethnographie, la sociologie et les analyses de discours. Ce numéro thématique espère ainsi saisir au concret et en contexte l’émergence (I), la négociation (II) et la mise en oeuvre (III) du genre dans le domaine de la paix et la sécurité internationales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".