Leaving no patient behind! Expert recommendation in the use of innovative technologies for diagnosing rare diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic diagnosis plays a crucial role in rare diseases, particularly with the increasing availability of emerging and accessible treatments. The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC) has set its primary goal as: "Ensuring that all patients who present with a suspected rare disease receive a diagnosis within one year if their disorder is documented in the medical literature". Despite significant advances in genomic sequencing technologies, more than half of the patients with suspected Mendelian disorders remain undiagnosed. In response, IRDiRC proposes the establishment of "a globally coordinated diagnostic and research pipeline". To help facilitate this, IRDiRC formed the Task Force on Integrating New Technologies for Rare Disease Diagnosis. This multi-stakeholder Task Force aims to provide an overview of the current state of innovative diagnostic technologies for clinicians and researchers, focusing on the patient's diagnostic journey. Herein, we provide an overview of a broad spectrum of emerging diagnostic technologies involving genomics, epigenomics and multi-omics, functional testing and model systems, data sharing, bioinformatics, and Artificial Intelligence (AI), highlighting their advantages, limitations, and the current state of clinical adaption. We provide expert recommendations outlining the stepwise application of these innovative technologies in the diagnostic pathways while considering global differences in accessibility. The importance of FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) and CARE (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics) data management is emphasized, along with the need for enhanced and continuing education in medical genomics. We provide a perspective on future technological developments in genome diagnostics and their integration into clinical practice. Lastly, we summarize the challenges related to genomic diversity and accessibility, highlighting the significance of innovative diagnostic technologies, global collaboration, and equitable access to diagnosis and treatment for people living with rare disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.123 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.021 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".