Spatial Tuning of Visual Responses to Symmetries in Textures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Symmetry is a biologically significant visual feature that relies on the perceptual grouping of spatially separate elements. Symmetry has been shown to play a role in numerous domains of visual perception in both humans and other animals. Brain imaging studies have revealed that several regions in the visual cortex exhibit robust and precise responses to symmetry. Here we explored the spatial mechanisms that mediate symmetry perception by measuring Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials using high-density EEG. Our stimuli were taken from a class of regular textures, known as wallpaper groups – a set of 17 unique combinations of symmetry types that represent the complete set of symmetries in 2D images. We focused on groups PMM, which contains reflection symmetry, and P4, which contains four-fold rotation symmetry, and generated exemplars from each group based on log-domain band-limited random noise patches. This approach allows us to manipulate both the spatial frequency content of the exemplars, and the scale of the lattice structure that is repeated to tile the plane in all wallpaper groups. Across 8 conditions, we varied spatial frequency between 1 to 8 cycles-per-degree (centre frequency of the noise patch), and the lattice scale between 1/12 and ½ (relative size of lattice to overall wallpaper). Consistent with previous studies we found that symmetry-specific responses were weaker overall for rotation compared to reflection. However, responses also exhibited clear evidence of spatial tuning, with low spatial frequency and small scale lattices generally producing the biggest responses for both wallpaper groups. Interestingly, reflection (PMM) and rotation (P4) symmetry elicited clearly distinct response patterns across the spatial frequencies and lattice scales, suggesting that the two symmetry types rely on distinct cortical mechanisms. Future studies will relate these findings to responses in distinct areas along the human visual processing hierarchy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it