A preliminary application and its error estimates of a simple stereo-camera measure system for the far-sea fishery of Pacific saury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pacific saury is one of the most economically important species in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. The management of this resource relies on precise input of biological data such as body length and is often hindered by a lack of such data on captured fish. This study explores the potential of electronic monitoring (EM) using off-the-shelf stereo cameras to overcome the challenges of collecting and measuring saury body length from the Pacific saury fishery. Using a calibrated WEEVIEW SID WV3000 3D camera, a total of 252 paired images with different shooting angles and distances were obtained for further measurement using Sebastes Stereo Image Analysis Software (SSIAS). The treatments for the measurement distance (MD) were 30 cm, 60 cm, and 100 cm, for the depression angle (DA) were 30°, 60°, and 90°, and for the position angle (PA) were 0°, 45°, and 315° (- 45°). An assistant calibration (AC) in the form of a 16 cm black ruler was also added used. The SSIAS measurement results indicated that the best measurement was obtained with 0° position angle, 90° depression angle, and 30 cm distance from the target fish. The use of AC in the SSIAS + AC measurement was proven to reduce the measurement error from 2.45 to 8.64% to - 1.86 to 0.01%. This study set the baseline for the application of EM on collecting saury body length and the use of AC has been proven to increase the measurement accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".