MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Learned Nonlinear Predictor for Critically Sampled 3D Point Cloud Attribute Compression

2024· article· en· W4402915779 on OpenAlexaff
Tam Thuc, Philip A. Chou, Gene Cheung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemComputer sciencePoint cloudCompression (physics)Cloud computingPoint (geometry)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsMaterials scienceGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study 3D point cloud attribute compression via a volumetric approach: assuming point cloud geometry is known at both encoder and decoder, parameters $\theta$ of a continuous attribute function $f: \mathbb{R}^{3} \mapsto \mathbb{R}$ are quantized to $\hat{\theta}$ and encoded, so that discrete samples $f_{\hat{\theta}}\left(\mathbf{x}_{i}\right)$ can be recovered at known 3D points $\mathbf{x}_{i} \in \mathbb{R}^{3}$ at the decoder. Specifically, we consider a nested sequences of function subspaces ${\mathcal{F}}_{l_{0}}^{(p)} \subseteq \cdots \subseteq {\mathcal{F}}_{L}^{(p)}$, where ${\mathcal{F}}_{l}^{(p)}$ is a family of functions spanned by B-spline basis functions of order $p, f_{l}^{*}$ is the projection of f on ${\mathcal{F}}_{l}^{(p)}$ represented as low-pass coefficients $F_{l}^{*}$, and $g_{l}^{*}$ is the residual function in an orthogonal subspace ${\mathcal{G}}_{l}^{(p)}$ (where ${\mathcal{G}}_{l}^{(p)} \oplus {\mathcal{F}}_{l}^{(p)}=$ $\left.{\mathcal{F}}_{l+1}^{(p)}\right)$ represented as high-pass coefficients $G_{l}^{*}$. In this paper, to improve coding performance over [1], we study predicting $f_{l+1}^{*}$ at level $l+1$ given $f_{l}^{*}$ at level l and encoding of $G_{l}^{*}$ for the $p=1$ case (RAHT (1)). For the prediction, we formalize RAHT (1) linear prediction in MPEG-PCC in a theoretical framework, and propose a new nonlinear predictor using a polynomial of bilateral filter. We derive equations to efficiently compute the critically sampled high-pass coefficients $G_{l}^{*}$ amenable to encoding. We optimize parameters in our resulting feed-forward network on a large training set of point clouds by minimizing a rate-distortion Lagrangian. Experimental results show that our improved framework outperforms the MPEG G-PCC predictor by $11 \%-12 \%$ in bit rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207