Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Image Fusion Based on Multiscale Smoothing-Sharpening Filter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasing demand for high temporal and spatial resolution multispectral image sequences, many studies have been carried out on fusion on Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images to obtain image sequences with a revisit cycle of 2 and 3 days and a spatial resolution of 10 m. However, current fusion methods suffer from complex computation and loss of spectral and spatial information. To address these issues, a Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 image fusion based on multiscale smoothing-sharpening filter (MSSF) method is proposed. MSSF combines well the initial spatial prediction obtained from the Landsat-8 image at the target date and the detailed image extracted from the Sentinel-2 image at the reference date. Thin plate spline interpolation with morphological opening-closing algorithm is implemented on the Landsat-8 image at the target date, and the Laplacian of Gaussian enhancement algorithm is applied to the Sentinel-2 image at the reference date in the preprocessing stage. Smoothing-sharpening filter (SSIF) is employed to separate the high and low frequency components of the two preprocessed images. The multiscale SSIF is then utilized to migrate the details from the preprocessed Sentinel-2 image to the preprocessed Landsat-8 image. The performance of MSSF and five compared methods was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Experiments on three remote sensing data sets gathered from different experimental sites confirm that the proposed MSSF method could efficiently generate Sentinel-2-like images with high spatial and spectral resolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".