Acid-Stable Cu Cluster Precatalysts Enable High Energy and Carbon Efficiency in CO<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical reduction of CO 2 in acidic media offers the advantage of high carbon utilization, but achieving high selectivity to C 2+ products at a low overpotential remains a challenge. We identified the chemical instability of oxide-derived Cu catalysts as a reason that advances in neutral/alkaline electrolysis do not translate to acidic conditions. In acid, Cu ions leach from Cu oxides, leading to the deactivation of the C 2+ -active sites of Cu nanoparticles. This prompted us to design acid-stable Cu cluster precatalysts that are reduced in situ to active Cu nanoparticles in strong acid. Operando Raman and X-ray spectroscopy indicated that the bonding between the Cu cluster precatalyst ligand and in situ formed Cu nanoparticles preserves a high density of undercoordinated Cu sites, resulting in a C 2 H 4 Faradaic efficiency of 62% at a low overpotential. The result is a 1.4-fold increase in energy efficiency compared with previous acidic CO 2 -to-C 2+ electrocatalytic systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".