A human-serum-free medium can induce more infectious P. falciparum gametocytes than a conventional human-serum-containing medium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malaria remains a global health problem, and the standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA) is a key functional assay for development of new interventions to stop malaria transmission from human to mosquito. For SMFA, media with ~ 10% of human serum has been used for infectious gametocyte cultures, however, there are multiple challenges to obtain a suitable human serum. Here we show a human-serum-free culture medium (HSF), which was a mixture of two stem cell culture media and AlbuMAX, supported infectious gametocyte growth. Moreover, the HSF-induced gametocytes elicited significantly higher numbers of oocysts compared to gametocytes cultured with conventional human serum medium (Conv). While some caution is required when comparing percent transmission reducing activity data generated from HSF-SMFA and Conv-SMFA, the HSF method can facilitate the establishment of gametocyte cultures or SMFA by bypassing the need for human serum. Thus, this study will support future development of P. falciparum transmission-blocking interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".