MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402924176 · doi:10.14309/crj.0000000000001499

Endoscopic Treatment of Bouveret Syndrome: Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy and Stone Basket Retrieval

2024· article· en· W4402924176 on OpenAlexaff
Daksh Datta, Cathal O’Leary, Eran Shlomovitz

Bibliographic record

VenueACG Case Reports Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLithotripsyGeneral surgerySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CASE REPORT Bouveret syndrome consists of gastric outlet obstruction from a gallstone in the stomach or proximal duodenum, after entering via a bilioenteric fistula. It is an uncommon complication that typically affects elderly, comorbid patients. Surgery is an effective but high-risk retrieval method.1,2 Endoscopic retrieval methods have become more common due to the reduced morbidity and shorter recovery time. Higher endoscopic success rates have been reported with electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy and subsequent stone retrieval.3,4 Limitations of endoscopy are difficulty with larger stones, equipment and expertise requirements, and a higher rate of recurrence.3,5 Our patient was a 77-year-old man who presented with coffee ground emesis and abdominal pain. His medical history included congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease. Computed tomography showed a bilioenteric fistula and a large gallstone obstructing the pylorus (Figure 1). Due to his high perioperative risk, endoscopic stone retrieval was performed (Video 1). Endoscopy showed a large gallstone obstructing the pylorus and preventing access to the postbulbar duodenum (Figure 2). The location of the tip of the endoscope is shown in the fluoroscopic image (inset, Figure 2). Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (Autolith; Boston Scientific, MA), where stones are fragmented with shear forces and cavitation bubbles, was used to fragment the stone. A stone basket fragmented larger fragments in the stomach to facilitate retrieval via the esophagus and to prevent distal small bowel impaction (Figure 3). Fluoroscopic image shows the fistula between the gallbladder and duodenum at the D2 segment (Figure 4). Total fragmentation time was 2.5 hours. The patient tolerated the procedure well and had no immediate complications. After 11-month follow-up, the patient has had no further episode of hematemesis, cholecystitis, or biliary obstruction. He is under the care of palliative care for end-stage heart disease. No further investigations are planned.Figure 1.: Axial (left) and coronal (right) computed tomography showing the gallstone impacted at the duodenum (arrow) and bilioenteric fistula (arrowhead). Pneumobilia is present (white arrow).Figure 2.: Endoscopic view of gallstone impacted at the pylorus. Fluoroscopic image of the endoscope position (inset).Figure 3.: Gallstone fragments.Figure 4.: Fluoroscopic visualization of bilioenteric fistula postretrieval. Contrast opacifies the gallbladder (black arrow), bilioenteric fistula (arrowhead), and flow passing into the distal duodenum (white arrow). LT, left. {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 1","caption":"Electrohydraulic lithotripsy and stone basket retrieval of gallstone.","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"1_0a2xr50q"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} DISCLOSURES Author contributions: All authors fulfil the ICMJE criteria for authorship, including the following: substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. C. O'Leary is the article guarantor. Financial disclosure: Dr Eran Shlomovitz is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Informed consent was obtained for this case report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACG Case Reports JournalSame topicBiliary and Gastrointestinal FistulasFrench-language works237,207