MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402925664 · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000002315

Epithelioid Fibrous Histiocytoma Is on a Continuum With Superficial ALK-rearranged Myxoid Spindle Cell Neoplasm

2024· article· en· W4402925664 on OpenAlexaff
Mia S. DeSimone, Igor Odintsov, Harrison Tsai, Brendan C. Dickson, Ahmed Al‐Omari, Jason L. Hornick, Christopher D.�M. Fletcher, David Papke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyCD34MedicineImmunohistochemistryAnaplastic lymphoma kinaseDermisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) rearrangements drive most examples of epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma (EFH) and have been reported in an emerging family of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) fusion-positive mesenchymal neoplasms, including superficial ones described under the rubric of "superficial ALK -rearranged myxoid spindle cell neoplasm" (SAMS). Here, we describe 35 superficial tumors with SAMS morphology, which occurred in 18 females (51%) and 17 males at a median age at presentation of 39 years (range: 6 to 82 y). Most tumors occurred on the lower extremity (25 tumors; 71%), followed by upper extremity (5; 14%), trunk (3; 9%), and face (2; 6%). Nine tumors were reported to have grown slowly before presentation, including >10 years in 2 cases. Tumors occurred primarily in the dermis (32 tumors; 91%) or subcutis (3; 9%); 8 dermal tumors extended into the subcutis. Median tumor size was 1.3 cm (range: 0.5 to 8.0 cm). Clinical follow-up was available for 12 patients (34%; range: 2 mo to 21 y; median: 2.7 y), none of whom experienced metastasis. One incompletely resected tumor recurred locally at 19 months, and no other patients experienced recurrence. Histologically, tumors were characterized by bland spindle-to-ovoid cells showing whorled growth and myxoid-to-collagenous stroma. Recurrent features included an epidermal collarette (19/30; 63%), perivascular hyalinization (20/35; 57%), amianthoid collagen (14/35; 40%), and metaplastic ossification (2/35; 6%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) demonstrated expression of ALK (24/31; 77%), CD34 (15/21; 71%), EMA (17/28; 61%), and S-100 (9/32; 28%). Eleven tumors showed hybrid morphologic features between EFH and SAMS; 9 of them (82%) showed cytomorphology typical of EFH but with whorled growth, myxoid stroma, and/or regions of spindle cell morphology. Two hybrid tumors showed sharp transitions between a region characteristic of EFH and a region characteristic of SAMS, with a concomitant sharp transition in EMA, CD34, and S-100 expression by IHC. Sequencing revealed ALK fusions in 15 of 19 tumors: 2 each with fusion partners FLNA , SQSTM1 , and VCL , and 1 each with COL1A2, DCTN1, EML4, FXR1, MPRIP , PLEKHH2, PRKAR1A, SPECC1L , and TLN2 . Thirteen of 14 ALK -rearranged tumors expressed ALK by IHC. Three tumors negative for ALK fusions instead harbored alternate RTK fusions ( NCOA4::RET , TRIM27::RET , and VIM :: NTRK3 ), and 1 tumor was negative for RTK alterations. CDKN2A / B deletions were found in 2 tumors with ALK fusions and both tumors with RET fusions. SAMS is on a morphologic and molecular genetic spectrum with EFH, with a similar body site distribution, frequent clinical presentation as an exophytic skin tumor, and invariably benign outcomes; we conclude that SAMS should be considered a histologic variant of EFH. Some morphologically typical examples harbor alternate RET and NTRK3 fusions, such that SAMS is not an appropriate designation for this morphologic class; instead, to highlight the clinicopathologic similarities to EFH, we propose the diagnostic term "myxoid spindle cell variant of epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207