Tracking Phytoplankton Biomass Amid Wildfire Smoke Interference Using Landsat 8 OLI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the escalating impact of wildfire smoke on the remote sensing of phytoplankton biomass in freshwater systems. Wildfire smoke disrupts the accuracy of Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) retrieval models, with Chl-a often used as a proxy for quantifying phytoplankton biomass. Given the increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires, there is a need for the development and refinement of remote sensing methodologies to effectively monitor phytoplankton dynamics under wildfire-impacted conditions. Here we developed a novel approach using Landsat’s coastal/aerosol band (B1) to screen for and categorize levels of wildfire smoke interference. By excluding high-interference data (B1 reflectance > 0.07) from the calibration set, Chl-a retrieval model performance using different Landsat band formulas improved significantly, with R2 increasing from 0.55 to as high as 0.80. Our findings demonstrate that Rayleigh-corrected reflectance, combined with B1 screening, provides a robust method for monitoring phytoplankton biomass even under moderate smoke interference, outperforming full atmospheric correction methods. This approach enhances the reliability of remote sensing in the face of increasing wildfire events, offering a valuable tool for the effective management of aquatic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".