MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402927764 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110905

Optimization of Fuzzy Mathematical Model of Rectangular-Shaped Parking Space

2024· article· en· W4402927764 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Arun Prasath Gurusamy Mahadevan, K. MURTHY, Madhusudhana Rao Battina, Saad Salman Ahmed, Bushra Hibras Al Sulaimi, Alia Khalfan Mohamed Salim Al Rahbi, Sara Ahmed Said Hilal Al Barwani, Abdulmalik Said Harib Hassan Al Hadhrami, Khadija Bilal Yousuf Al Bahrani

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Parking Systems Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Fuzzy logicComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the dynamic expansion of urban population, there arises a pressing need to establish well-defined parameters for parking spaces.The provision of parking plays a pivotal role in both residential complexes and commercial establishments.Ill-conceived roadside parking areas can result in severe traffic congestion, and at times, even lead to accidents.Different car sizes need different parking lot sizes.Therefore, given these factors, adaptable parking solutions have become imperative.Within the framework of the proposed research, the parking spaces in question are envisaged as rectangles, and a mathematical model has been devised within a fuzzy environment.Numerical examples are taken to illustrate the mathematical model.LINGO software is used to solve the mathematical model and MATLAB is used to define the fuzzy variable.At the outset the results will reveal the importance of making the length of the parking space in fuzzy environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicSmart Parking Systems ResearchFrench-language works237,207