MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402942687 · doi:10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_120_23

Effectiveness of Intra-articular Botulinum Toxin Type A with Hyaluronic Acid Compared to Intra-articular Platelet-rich Plasma with Hyaluronic Acid in Improving Pain and Functional Limitation in Knee Osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4402942687 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shubha V. Hegde, Khaja J Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Pain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyaluronic acidPlatelet-rich plasmaOsteoarthritisMedicineArticular cartilageIntra articularBotulinum toxinPharmacologyPlateletInternal medicineSurgeryPathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common cause of chronic knee pain causing functional disability and dependency. Multiple interventions have been used in reducing pain and improving functionality. We intend to compare the efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) with botulinum toxin type A and HA in bilateral Grade 3 and 4 KOA. Methods: Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted for 6 months. Among 54 participants, 27 received intra-articular botulinum toxin type A with HA (Group A), and the other 27 received intra-articular PRP with HA (Group B), single session. Pain (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) and functional limitation (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) were assessed at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks postintervention. Effect of weight and physiotherapy on NRS and WOMAC score were assessed. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed by statistical software R version 4.2.3. Results: Fifty-four participants were enrolled. There was no loss to follow-ups. Except for age ( P < 0.001) and mean height ( P = 0.013), other demographic data were insignificant. Preprocedural NRS was significantly high in Group A ( P = 0.04). Overall NRS postprocedure was significantly lesser in Group B, P < 0.001. The mean WOMAC score postprocedure was significantly low in Group B, P < 0.001. Group B had increased heart rate which was statistically significant ( P = 0.051). The mean reduction in WOMAC score was observed with regular physiotherapy in Group B ( P = 0.023). Reduction in weight was directly proportional to reduction in NRS ( P = 0.015). Conclusion: Intra-articular PRP with HA, single session, is effective in improving pain, functionality, and safe in Grade 3 and 4 KOA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of PainSame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207