MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402947180 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110920

A New Face Image Manipulation Localization and Recovery Algorithm Using Image Watermarking and Integer Wavelet Transform

2024· article· en· W4402947180 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Asmaa Hatem Jawad, Rasha Thabit, Muntadher H. Al-Hadaad, Khamis A. Zidan

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Stabilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage (mathematics)Integer (computer science)Artificial intelligenceDigital watermarkingFace (sociological concept)Computer visionWavelet transformComputer scienceWaveletAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recognizing different kinds of modifications and identifying the altered portions of the face region have been the main focus of recent developments in face image manipulation detection.In actual applications, the ability to restore the facial region after modification localization would be highly helpful, but this was not addressed in earlier studies.This research utilizes integer wavelet transform (IWT) coefficients to produce recovery information from the face region and watermarking-based technique for incorporating the generated data into the cover face image.Three distinct algorithms have been proposed for producing the recovery data, and the one demonstrating superior performance, specifically IWT (cdf 3.5), is employed within main algorithms.The novelty of the suggested technique stems from its integration of an IWT-based recovery method, along with the manipulation detection process, which has not been showcased in prior research studies.The main contributions of the suggested algorithm include its efficiency to precisely identify altered blocks within the facial area and to reinstate the unaltered version when modifications are present.The advantage of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated through the comparisons with earlier methods where it can be used in digital art to ensure the originality, integrity, and security of facial images.The practical applications include various fields such as forensic investigations, digital image authentication, online safety, content moderation, medical imaging, security systems, entertainment, privacy protection, historical documentation, The limitation of the proposed algorithm is the restricted embedding capacity.The future researches can be conducted in different directions such as enhancing the embedding capacity, implementing a real-time detection system for live video streams, and investigating the main requirements for efficient algorithm's execution on hardware devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicImage and Video StabilizationFrench-language works237,207