Transforming Smart City Governance for Quality of Life and Sustainable Development in Semarang City, Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study seeks to thoroughly understand the catalysts driving Semarang, one of Indonesia's cities, to become a smart city, with the ultimate goal of improving the long-term well-being of its citizens.Driven by the various barriers that exist in urban development, we begin with a thorough examination of the causes influencing this shift, focusing on the critical role played by Semarang's local government.Semarang, with its rich history and environmental challenges, provides a distinct case study of urban life in Indonesia.Our research used a diverse approach to unravel the rich narrative of Semarang's evolution, including interviews and observational analysis.Our findings highlight the function of the local government in crafting concepts of sustainable development, innovation and community engagement into Semarang's urban planning framework to aid its transition to a smart city.Key drivers of this transition include the development of local regulations, government readiness, and stakeholder collaboration.While seemingly small, these efforts have had a tremendous impact on human progress, providing important insights for the community.This study needs to continue with comparisons with other cities, we want to learn about lessons that can be used to optimize urban ecosystems around the world, ensuring that the quality of life for all citizens improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it