Machine learning for characterizing uncertain elastic properties of fused filament fabricated materials for topology optimization applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The layering approach used in fused filament fabrication (FFF) enables creation of complex designs generated by topology optimization. Defects associated with the layer-by-layer process, introduce considerable random variability to the local elastic modulus of the print. The elastic modulus along the fusion layers connecting bulk materials differs from that of the bulk areas. Accurate quantitative measurements of variations in both areas are essential to achieve robust optimized designs. This study aims to quantify the parameters of the random distributions given the surface strain field of the print measured by digital image correlation (DIC). Two statistical properties, mean and standard deviation, are sufficient to characterize the stochastic elastic modulus fields in each region. An efficient neural network model is developed to estimate spatial variations in the local elastic modulus within both bulk and fusion layers. This model is trained on a dataset of synthetic strain fields with known distributions in the elastic modulus fields. It performs well in correlating the elastic modulus with the input strain, as long as the standard deviation is below 60% of the mean of the random field. The predictive accuracy of the model on testing data, measured by the R2 score, is 0.99 and 0.95 for mean and standard deviation in the fusion material. The scores for the bulk material are 0.97 each. The trained model is implemented to predict the elastic modulus distribution of an FFF-printed material at a print speed of 30 mm/s and an extrusion temperature of 493.15 K, based on its DIC-measured surface strain data. The model predicts a mean and standard deviation of 1.2 GPa and 1 GPa for the bulk material and 400 MPa and 430 MPa for the fusion region. Validation of predictions confirms the reliability of this approach in measuring uncertainty in the local properties of the prints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".