Optimal regularity of subsonic steady-states solution of Euler-Poisson equations for semiconductors with sonic boundary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the optimal regularity of the stationary sonic-subsonic solution to the unipolar isothermal hydrodynamic model of semiconductors with sonic boundary. Applying the comparison principle and the energy estimate, we obtain the regularity of the sonic-subsonic solution as $C^{\frac{1}{2}}[0,1]\cap W^{1,p}(0,1)$ for any $p<2$, which is then proved to be optimal by analyzing the property of solution around the singular point on the sonic line, i.e., $ρ\notin C^ν[0,1]$ for any $ν>\frac{1}{2}$, and $ρ\notin W^{1,κ}(0,1)$ for any $κ\ge 2$. Furthermore, we explore the influence of the semiconductors effect on the singularity of solution at sonic points $x=1$ and $x=0$, that is, the solution always has strong singularity at sonic point $x=1$ for any relaxation time $τ>0$, but, once the relaxation time is sufficiently large $τ\gg 1$, then the sonic-subsonic steady-states possess the strong singularity at both sonic boundaries $x=0$ and $x=1$. We also show that the pure subsonic solution $ρ$ belongs to $W^{2,\infty}(0,1)$, which can be embedded into $C^{1,1}[0,1]$, and it is much better than the regularity of sonic-subsonic solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".