MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402955320 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.01863

Internality of autonomous algebraic differential equations

2024· preprint· en· W4402955320 on OpenAlexafffund
Christine Eagles, Léo Jimenez

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsMathematicsAlgebraic numberCorollaryOrdinary differential equationFunction (biology)Class (philosophy)Differential equationPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsWork (physics)Algebraic equationDifferential algebraic equationAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysisComputer scienceNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is interested in internality to the constants of systems of autonomous algebraic ordinary differential equations. Roughly, this means determining when can all solutions of such a system be written as a rational function of finitely many fixed solutions (and their derivatives) and finitely many constants. If the system is a single order one equation, the answer was given in an old article of Rosenlicht. In the present work, we completely answer this question for a large class of systems. As a corollary, we obtain a necessary condition for the generic solution to be Liouvillian. We then apply these results to determine exactly when solutions to Poizat equations (a special case of Liénard equations) are internal, answering a question of Freitag, Jaoui, Marker and Nagloo, and to the classic Lotka-Volterra system, showing that its generic solutions are almost never Liouvillian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207