MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402956164 · doi:10.5376/ija.2024.14.0016

Genomic and Developmental Approaches to Enhance Reproductive Success and Growth in Eel (</i>Anguilla</i> spp.)

2024· article· en· W4402956164 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinni Wu, Fei Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aquaculture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemical and Pharmacological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyFisheryZoologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eels ( Anguilla spp.) exhibit complex life cycles and face challenges such as habitat loss and overexploitation, necessitating innovative approaches to enhance their reproductive success and growth. The primary objective of this study is to explore genomic and developmental methods to improve eel reproduction and growth, with a focus on understanding the underlying biological mechanisms and identifying strategies for aquaculture improvements. Recent research has highlighted several key findings. In Japanese eel ( Anguilla japonica ), androgen regulation has been shown to significantly influence ovarian growth and follicle development. In European eel ( Anguilla anguilla ), recombinant gonadotropins can effectively induce spermatogenesis and sperm release, improving reproductive outcomes. Additionally, studies have revealed complex relationships between growth rates and environmental factors such as temperature, which affect eel development over time. The expression of gonadotropin subunits and receptors during different stages of oogenesis has also been characterized, providing insights into the hormonal regulation of reproduction. These findings underscore the potential of genomic and developmental approaches to enhance eel reproductive success and growth. By leveraging hormonal regulation, recombinant gonadotropins, and understanding environmental influences, significant advancements can be made in eel aquaculture. These strategies not only improve reproductive efficiency but also contribute to the conservation and sustainable management of eel populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AquacultureSame topicPhytochemical and Pharmacological StudiesFrench-language works237,207