MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402956195 · doi:10.5376/bm.2024.15.0012

Transcriptomic Approaches to Studying Rice Pathogen Interactions

2024· article· en· W4402956195 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yumin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscriptomePathogenBiologyComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the intricate interactions between rice ( Oryza sativa ) and its pathogens is crucial for developing effective disease management strategies. Transcriptomic approaches have significantly advanced our knowledge in this area by enabling comprehensive profiling of gene expression during infection. This study leverages high-quality RNA sequencing and other transcriptomic techniques to explore the dynamic interactions between rice and various pathogens, including the rice blast fungus ( Magnaporthe oryzae ) and the Rice black-streaked dwarf virus (RBSDV). Key findings include the identification of differentially expressed mRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that play essential roles in rice's defense mechanisms, as well as novel microRNAs (miRNAs) that regulate pathogen resistance genes. Additionally, tissue-specific expression patterns of pathogenicity genes and miRNAs were observed, providing deeper insights into the dual-epidemics of blast disease. These transcriptomic analyses offer a valuable resource for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying rice-pathogen interactions and pave the way for developing improved disease-resistant rice varieties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.304
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.052 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience MethodsSame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207