HVAC/R Systems Modelling: Assessing Mathematical Model for Gas Compressor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ventilation, cooling, heating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems represent a substantial portion, approximately 40%, of energy consumption in buildings.Among the key components of HVAC/R systems, the compressor, fans, and electrical resistances are major consumers of electricity.In this context, the compressor stands out due to its significant dynamic behaviour, serving as the pivotal element in heat pump operations.However, many manufacturers solely provide empirical data regarding compressor performance, lacking comprehensive models for assessing performance across various operational conditions.This paper addresses the methodology for evaluating mathematical models utilizing experimental compressor data.Through this approach, we aim to bridge the gap between empirical observations and predictive modelling, enabling a more nuanced understanding and optimization of HVAC/R system performance.The proposed model uses interpolation and it takes as input the evaporation and condensation temperatures.It shows an Rsquare and adjusted Rsquare value of 0.99.By using the experimental data and an opensource library for interpolation this paper paves the way for a flexible and practical compressor modelling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".