Fatty Acids as Phase Change Materials for Building Applications: Drawbacks and Future Developments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The worldwide population growth and its increasing affluence have led to an increase in global building energy consumption. Therefore, developing sustainable energy storage materials to mitigate this problem has become a high priority for many researchers. Organic phase change materials (PCMs), such as fatty acids, have been extensively studied for thermal energy storage in building applications due to their excellent performance in absorbing and releasing energy within the environment temperature ranges. However, issues related to their thermal conductivity, stability, and flammability could limit the potential and require addressing. In this review, organic PCMs, with a special focus on fatty acids, are discussed. This review covers recent studies related to PCM synthesis from bio-sources, methods for PCM incorporation in building materials, methods for enhancing organic PCM thermal properties, flammability challenges, and life cycle assessment. Finally, future opportunities are summarized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it