MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402964300 · doi:10.3390/s24196300

SecureVision: Advanced Cybersecurity Deepfake Detection with Big Data Analytics

2024· article· en· W4402964300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media Forensic Detection
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityData scienceDeceptionFlexibility (engineering)AnalyticsField (mathematics)Big dataComputer securityTrustworthinessBenchmark (surveying)Data miningDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SecureVision is an advanced and trustworthy deepfake detection system created to tackle the growing threat of 'deepfake' movies that tamper with media, undermine public trust, and jeopardize cybersecurity. We present a novel approach that combines big data analytics with state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms to detect altered information in both audio and visual domains. One of SecureVision's primary innovations is the use of multi-modal analysis, which improves detection capabilities by concurrently analyzing many media forms and strengthening resistance against advanced deepfake techniques. The system's efficacy is further enhanced by its capacity to manage large datasets and integrate self-supervised learning, which guarantees its flexibility in the ever-changing field of digital deception. In the end, this study helps to protect digital integrity by providing a proactive, scalable, and efficient defense against the ubiquitous threat of deepfakes, thereby establishing a new benchmark for privacy and security measures in the digital era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it