MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402966658 · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101063

VONet: A deep learning network for 3D reconstruction of organoid structures with a minimal number of confocal images

2024· article· en· W4402966658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePatterns · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersMinistry of Trade, Industry and Energy
KeywordsOrganoidConfocalArtificial intelligenceDeep learningComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)Computer visionNeurosciencePsychologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organoids and 3D imaging techniques are crucial for studying human tissue structure and function, but traditional 3D reconstruction methods are expensive and time consuming, relying on complete z stack confocal microscopy data. This paper introduces VONet, a deep learning-based system for 3D organoid rendering that uses a fully convolutional neural network to reconstruct entire 3D structures from a minimal number of z stack images. VONet was trained on a library of over 39,000 virtual organoids (VOs) with diverse structural features and achieved an average intersection over union of 0.82 in performance validation. Remarkably, VONet can predict the structure of deeper focal plane regions, unseen by conventional confocal microscopy. This innovative approach and VO dataset offer significant advancements in 3D bioimaging technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it