MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402969711 · doi:10.1117/12.3031734

Adaptive hardware acceleration architecture for ASIC transcoding

2024· article· en· W4402969711 on OpenAlexaff
Pavel Novotný, Avinash Ramachandran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApplication-specific integrated circuitTranscodingComputer scienceArchitectureHardware accelerationAccelerationEmbedded systemComputer architectureComputer hardwareField-programmable gate arrayOperating systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current scale of online video streaming requires hardware accelerated video transcoding solutions. Historically, hardware solutions have been excellent at offloading the computationally intensive tasks from CPUs, but often came with the penalty of being inflexible and not quickly adaptable to emerging market trends. We are presenting an architecture, which maintains all the benefits of hardware acceleration but also adds an unparalleled level of programmability and flexibility. This architecture supports a wide spectrum of markets ranging from ultra-low latency encoding all the way to high quality video on demand (VOD) markets with only firmware changes. These capabilities are achieved by a strategic combination of built-in hardware acceleration components and many embedded CPUs that have full control over the video encoding pipeline flow. This architecture not only provides deterministic timing, which is critical for ultra-low latency transcoding, but it also offers flexibility and programmability allowing robust product roadmaps through simple firmware updates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207