Harnessing radiative pumping in 2D perovskite microcavities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microcavity exciton-polaritons are bosonic quasiparticles that result from the hybridization of excitons and modes of a confined electromagnetic field in a regime known as strong light-matter coupling. Having a low effective mass, polaritons can undergo condensation, the macroscopic occupation of the lowest energy and momentum state. Two-dimensional (2D) perovskites are promising candidates for polariton condensation due to their high exciton binding energies, low non-radiative recombination rates and strong oscillator strengths. However, despite their optimal optoelectronic properties, there are no reports of room temperature polariton condensation in 2D perovskites and only one unreproduced report at low temperature. In this study, we systematically examine the interplay between the emission from the exciton reservoir and the population of the lower polariton. We gain insights on how the spectral features of the emission of 2D perovskites affect polariton relaxation and onto one of the mechanisms making polariton condensation challenging in 2D perovskites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".