MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fabry Perot Array Antenna Design Using Machine Learning

2024· article· en· W4402979186 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAntenna (radio)Antenna arrayFabry–Pérot interferometerElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we employ a machine learning-based approach to reduce the computational time and energy required for designing and optimizing the partially reflective surface (PRS) structure used in Fabry Perot (FP) antennas. This approach fits the relationship between the PRS geometry and relative permittivity chosen as inputs in terms of the phase gradient of the PRS reflection coefficient chosen as outputs. Subsequently, to validate our approach, we designed a flexible material-based FP antenna exhibiting an enhanced realized gain of 14 dB within a frequency band centered at 24 GHz, suitable for radar applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207