MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Broadband Circularly Polarized SIW-Based H-Plane Horn Antenna for X/Ku Band Applications

2024· article· en· W4402979220 on OpenAlexaff
Anil Kumar Nayak, I.M. Filanovsky, Saptarshi Ghosh, Kambiz Moez, Amalendu Patnaik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandHorn antennaKu bandFrench hornAntenna (radio)OpticsCircular polarizationTurnstile antennaPhysicsOptoelectronicsDirectional antennaTelecommunicationsSlot antennaEngineeringMicrostripAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a circularly polarized (CP) substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW)-based H-plane horn antenna with broader impedance bandwidth and higher peak realized gain (PRG) for armature satellite services (X-band, 8–12 GHz) and broadcast satellite (Ku-band, 12–18 GHz) applications is presented. A tapered microstrip transition is used in the feeding section to obtain the broadband characteristics. In addition, the feeding component of the antenna utilizes three quarter-wavetransformers to enhance impedance matching and widen the bandwidth. To generate the CP, two rows of rectangular slots are etched from both the top and bottom metal surfaces of the design. The antenna is designed, fabricated, and tested. The measured fractional impedance bandwidth of 41.6%, the 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth of 3.8 GHz, the maximum PRG of 6.95 dBic, the maximum radiation efficiency (simulated) of 87 %, and the cross-polarization level below -40 dB have been achieved at the center frequency of 13.2 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207