MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulation of RCS Reconfigurable Characteristics for Bistable Glass Fiber Material Printed Antenna

2024· article· en· W4402979577 on OpenAlexaff
Pingyu Li, Shu Lin, Zhiheng Liu, Yuwei Zhang, Xingqi Zhang, Xinyue Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBistabilityMaterials scienceAntenna (radio)FiberElectronic engineeringOpticsOptoelectronicsComputer scienceComposite materialEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To meet the varying requirements of radar cross section (RCS) enhancement or reduction for aircraft in different scenarios, a simulation study is conducted on a reconfigurable printed antenna with RCS reconfigurable characteristics based on bistable glass fiber material. This antenna achieves two hollow cylindrical configurations by toggling the states of the bistable glass fiber material. Simulation results indicate that the antenna exhibits excellent RCS reconfigurability within the operating frequency range. Under orthogonal incident waves, there is a significant difference in the bistatic RCS between the two antenna configurations, reaching a maximum value of over 20 dB.The investigated antenna operates in the band of 0.93-1.95 GHz and features a simple structure and flexible switching capabilities. It can adapt its antenna configurations according to practical application needs, presenting promising prospects for diverse applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207