Sub-THz Compact On-Chip Dipole Antennas for 6G Application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two separate designs of a meandered sub-THz dipole antenna having potential for 6G application on a commercial 65 nm CMOS are presented in this article. Meandering of the antenna reduces the length of the antenna and hence the chip area. Widening the dipole arms without violating the design rule checks (DRC) of the CMOS foundry increases the impedance bandwidth. A 1-strip meandered on-chip dipole antenna occupies an area of$554 \mu \mathrm{m} \times 60 \mu \mathrm{m}$resulting in 32.4 % of fractional$S_{11}$bandwidth ranging from 83.5-115.8 GHz with a gain of -2.9 dBi at 100 GHz. A 2-strip meandered on-chip dipole results in 38.2 % of fractional$S_{11}$bandwidth ranging from 78.2-115.2 GHz with a gain of -2.5 dBi at 100 GHz while occupying a silicon area of$582 \mu \mathrm{m} \times 58 \mu \mathrm{m}$. The proposed on-chip dipole antennas are good candidates for 6G sub-THz communication applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".