MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Near-Field Probe Failure in Antenna Far-Field Pattern Estimation

2024· article· en· W4402981046 on OpenAlexaff
Yanyan Zhang, Rodney G. Vaughan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsSierra Wireless (Canada)Simon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNear and far fieldAntenna (radio)Field (mathematics)Computer scienceAcousticsGeologyTelecommunicationsPhysicsOpticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate pattern measurement requires a near field (NF) facility which is expensive to both acquire and also maintain in ideal working condition. For fast NF measurement, multiple NF probes are often used on the NF aperture with their sampling time-multiplexed. This comes at the cost of the extra electronics and probes but simplifies the precision robotics required for sampling the NF surface. Another cost is an increased failure probability, and so a practical problem with NF facilities is the failure of a NF probe. The impact on the FF pattern estimate may not be obvious depending on the FF pattern shape and the relative location of the failed probe. There seems to be no treatment of this in the literature, so this paper discusses examples for a typical range (Satimo SG64, with 5 m cubed chamber) and a typical antenna where the pattern detail is important, viz., a small C-band fixed-beam slot array used for synthetic aperture radar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207