MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Key-Space Partitioned LSM Tree for CMM-H

2024· article· en· W4402981248 on OpenAlexaff
Seung‐Ho Lim, Seung Won Yoo, Joontaek Oh, Wonseb Jeong, Hyunsub Song, Hyeonho Song, Dong Hun Lee, Youjip Won

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsKey (lock)Computer scienceTree (set theory)Space (punctuation)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsCombinatoricsComputer securityOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Log-Structured Merge Tree (LSM Tree) is widely employed in key-value stores, ensuring efficient database read performance at the expense of increased write stall. While this stall enhances read performance, it notably degrades write efficiency. This paper examines the write stall phenomenon in LSM Tree-based key-value stores and proposes a solution: Key Space Partitioned RocksDB. This architecture comprises a MemTable backed by Storage DRAM, the Key Space Partitioned MemTable, and the Key Space Partitioned LSM Tree. Key Space Partitioned RocksDB demonstrates a$1.7\times$enhancement in YCSB-A throughput compared to conventional RocksDB, a$3.5\times$reduction in average GET(key) latency, and a$1.2 \times$decrease in average PUT (key, value) latency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNatural Language Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207