MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Potential distribution of Acerophagus papayae, a parasitoid of the papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus), across Africa

2024· article· en· W4402982151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch on scale insects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchInternational Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaDirektion für Entwicklung und ZusammenarbeitDarwin InitiativeMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsMealybugBiologyParasitoidBotanyBiological pest controlPEST analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Data for parasitoid biocontrol of Paraccocus marginatus in areas at risk of invasion. • West Africa showed high suitability for both pest and parasitoid. • Large areas of east and central Africa were suitable for pest but not for parasitoid. • Annual precipitation and minimum temperatures most affected parasitoid suitability. The papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus , is a highly polyphagous invasive pest that affects at least 133 economically important crops, and causes economic losses worldwide. Acerophagus papayae (Noyes and Schauff), a parasitic wasp, has proven to be a successful biocontrol agent, but its use in Africa is limited. Here, we use a predictive correlative model to explore the potential distribution of A. papayae and relate it to data showing the potential distribution of P. marginatus , to highlight potentially suitable areas for biological control of P. marginatus , for its current distribution, as well as its potential future distribution. The resulting model performed well with a test AUC of 0.89. Areas that were highly suitable for P. marginatus and were also suitable for A. papayae were highest across West Africa. Whilst there were areas which were suitable for both species in both East Africa and Central Africa, there were large areas of cropping land which were highly suitable for P. marginatus although not suitable for A. papayae . Across Northern and Southern Africa, there were limited cropping areas which were suitable for P. marginatus and where there was suitability, it was only moderate. Across these areas, there was limited suitability for A. papayae . Our results offer refined information on the potential suitability for A. papayae across Africa with the aim to help guide decisions on the areas where use of A. papayae could be used effectively as a part of an integrated pest management programme against P. marginatus .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it