MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402985285 · doi:10.21873/anticanres.17270

Factors Limiting Ostomy Reversal After Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study

2024· article· en· W4402985285 on OpenAlex
Beatriz Santana, Frédéric Guyon, Octavio Arencibia, Guillaume Babin, Eudaldo Tommasetti, Daniel González, Sabrina Piedimonte, Alicia Martín Martínez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnticancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytoreductive surgeryLimitingMedicineRetrospective cohort studyOvarian cancerCancerSurgeryOncologyGynecologyGeneral surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the factors related to non-reversal of ostomy after cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer. In many women with ovarian cancer, transitory ostomies are performed to limit the consequences of anastomotic leak. Although intended to be temporary, a proportion of these ostomies might never be reversed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with 2014 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage IIB-IVB ovarian cancer requiring a transitory ostomy during primary or secondary cytoreductive surgery at the Bergonie Institute, France, and the University Hospital of Las Palmas, Spain, between January 2012 and December 2022. Rate of ostomy reversal, its timing (weeks) and postoperative complications were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify limiting factors for ostomy reversal. RESULTS: During the study period, we reviewed data on 181 consecutive patients with ovarian cancer with transitory ostomy creation; 89 (49.2%) patients were not candidates for an ostomy reversal surgery because of disease progression (n=65), death (n=16), and patient's refusal of surgery (n=8). A total of 92 patients were candidates for reversal surgery and were therefore included in the final analysis. In total, 57 (62%) patients had their ostomy reversed. The mean time from ostomy creation to ostomy closure was 47.7 (standard deviation=33.1) weeks. Hartmann's procedure (leaving a rectal stump of 5-6 cm) was identified as an independent predictive factor for non-reversal of ostomy (odds ratio=6.42, 95% confidence interval=1.61-25.53; p=0.008). Complications after ostomy reversal occurred in 32 patients (34.8%). CONCLUSION: Hartmann's procedure is a limiting factor for ostomy reversal in patients with ovarian cancer. We recommend avoiding Hartmann's procedure during cytoreductive surgery, even after colorectal anastomotic leak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it