MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402985294 · doi:10.29303/jbegati.v5i2.1294

SISTEM INFORMASI DINAS KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN KABUPATEN DOMPU PROVINSI NUSA TENGGARA BARAT BERBASIS WEBSITE MENGGUNAKAN FRAMEWORK BOOTSTRAP DAN CODEIGNITER

2024· article· id· W4402985294 on OpenAlexaff
Zahrahtun Munirah, Santi Ika Murpratiwi, Ramlah Ramlah

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Begawe Teknologi Informasi (JBegaTI) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Dompu Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat adalah lembaga pemerintah yang bertanggung jawab atas pengelolaan, pengembangan, dan perlindungan sumber daya kelautan dan perikanan. Salah satu peran pentingnya yaitu mengkoordinasikan kegiatan pengelolaan sumber daya kelautan dan perikanan, termasuk penangkapan ikan yang berkelanjutan, pengembangan budidaya perikanan serta pelestarian lingkungan laut. Saai ini Kelautan dan Perikanan sudah memiliki website company profile untuk menyajikan informasi terkait kantor tersebut, akan tetapi website tersebut memiliki fitur-fitur yang kurang lengkap seperti tidak adanya foto-foto dari unit kerja dari seluruh pegawai yang bekerja serta tidak adanya sistem validasi oleh Kapala Bidang pada saat admin menginputkan berita. Dengan dibuatnya sistem informasi ini, dapat memberikan aksesibilitas informasi kepada masyarakat terkait dengan layanan, program, kebijakan, dan kegiatan yang diselenggarakan oleh Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Dompu Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Begawe Teknologi Informasi (JBegaTI)Same topicDecision Support System ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207