Italian Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (Ita-MAUQ): Translation and Validation Study in People With Multiple Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine and mobile health (mHealth) apps have emerged as powerful tools in health care, offering convenient access to services and empowering participants in managing their health. Among populations with chronic and progressive disease such as multiple sclerosis (MS), mHealth apps hold promise for enhancing self-management and care. To be used in clinical practice, the validity and usability of mHealth tools should be tested. The most commonly used method for assessing the usability of electronic technologies are questionnaires. Objective: This study aimed to translate and validate the English version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire into Italian (ita-MAUQ) in a sample of people with MS. Methods: The 18-item mHealth App Usability Questionnaire was forward- and back-translated from English into Italian by an expert panel, following scientific guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation. The ita-MAUQ (patient version for stand-alone apps) comprises 3 subscales, which are ease of use, interface and satisfaction, and usefulness. After interacting with DIGICOG-MS (Digital Assessment of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis), a novel mHealth app for cognitive self-assessment in MS, people completed the ita-MAUQ and the System Usability Scale, included to test construct validity of the translated questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity were assessed. Known-groups validity was examined based on disability levels as indicated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and gender. Results: In total, 116 people with MS (female n=74; mean age 47.2, SD 14 years; mean EDSS 3.32, SD 1.72) were enrolled. The ita-MAUQ demonstrated acceptable model fit, good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.92), and moderate test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation 0.84). Spearman coefficients revealed significant correlations between the ita-MAUQ total score; the ease of use (5 items), interface and satisfaction (7 items), and usefulness subscales; and the System Usability Scale (all P values <.05). Known-group analysis found no difference between people with MS with mild and moderate EDSS (all P values >.05), suggesting that ambulation ability, mainly detected by the EDSS, did not affect the ita-MAUQ scores. Interestingly, a statistical difference between female and male participants concerning the ease of use ita-MAUQ subscale was found (P=.02). Conclusions: The ita-MAUQ demonstrated high reliability and validity and it might be used to evaluate the usability, utility, and acceptability of mHealth apps in people with MS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".