El arte público del Vancouverismo. Itinerarios contemporáneos por False Creek y Coal Harbour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo es el resultado de una investigación sobre arte público en Canadá, el cual se centra en la ciudad de Vancouver. La primera parte es una introducción general que trata el enfoque de los itinerarios (como metodología de estudio), en el contexto canadiense y específicamente en el de Vancouver. La segunda parte es el estudio en detalle del caso del “Vancouverismo” y cómo el arte público se ha hecho manifiesto en él. Se define entonces este fenómeno urbano y sus elementos, se presenta su historia particular, y finalmente se despliega el enfoque de los itinerarios de arte público en las dos áreas urbanas específicas de False Creek Norte y Coal Harbour. Los recorridos visuales y comentados muestran como resultado las obras de arte público en contexto del Vancouverismo, comprendiendo así su valor estético en relación con la ciudad, el lugar y la memoria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".