Improving Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks for the Internet of Things Using Data Replication-Based Deep Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Localization is one of the most challenging problems in wireless sensor networks (WSNs), primarily driven by the need to develop an accurate and cost-effective localization system for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. While machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely applied in various WSN-based tasks, their effectiveness is often compromised by limited training data, leading to issues such as overfitting and reduced accuracy, especially when the number of sensor nodes is low. A key strategy to mitigate overfitting involves increasing both the quantity and diversity of the training data. To address the limitations posed by small datasets, this paper proposes an intelligent data augmentation strategy (DAS)-based deep neural network (DNN) that enhances the localization accuracy of WSNs. The proposed DAS replicates the estimated positions of unknown nodes generated by the Dv-hop algorithm and introduces Gaussian noise to these replicated positions, creating multiple modified datasets. By combining the modified datasets with the original training data, we significantly increase the dataset size, which leads to a substantial reduction in normalized root mean square error (NRMSE). The experimental results demonstrate that this data augmentation technique significantly improves the performance of DNNs compared to the traditional Dv-hop algorithm at a low number of nodes while maintaining an efficient computational cost for data augmentation. Therefore, the proposed method provides a scalable and effective solution for enhancing the localization accuracy of WSNs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".