Stability and Control of Car Dynamics with a Quarter Model via a Novel Simple Harmonic Hump under External Force
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of the road, such as speed bumps, can significantly affect a car’s stability. This study focuses on how a quarter-car model is affected by a basic harmonic speed hump and how Cubic Negative Velocity Control (CNVC) is used to control the amplitude of disturbances. This study differs from earlier research in considering various control and force kinds that impact the system. The external forces in this context are a component of a non-linear dynamic system. Two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) differential coupled equations describe the system’s equation. Numerous numerical experiments have been conducted, including proportional derivative (PD), negative derivative feedback (NDF), positive position feedback (PPF), linear negative velocity control (LNVC), and CNVC; the results show that when the hump is represented as a simple harmonic hump, CNVC has the best effect and can regulate vibrations more precisely than the other approaches on this system. Subsequently, the vibration value of the system was numerically analyzed both before and after the control was implemented. Using the frequency response equation and phase plane approaches in conjunction with the Runge–Kutta fourth order method (RK-4) in the context of resonance situation analysis, the stability of the numerical solution has been evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".