MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402993686 · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107378

Parametric optimization of SIP connection geometry in CFS-MRF structures: A finite element study

2024· article· en· W4402993686 on OpenAlexafffund
Hussein Shawki Osman, Mohammed H. Serror, Elsayed Fathallah

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFonds de recherche du Québec
KeywordsConnection (principal bundle)Finite element methodParametric statisticsStructural engineeringGeometryMaterials scienceComputer scienceAcousticsPhysicsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural buildings should be designed to resist both static and dynamic loads. There are different types of structural systems that can support seismic loads. Moment-resisting frames (MRFs) are widely used for seismic purposes, relying on the plastic deformations occurring between the beam and column. The main problems of cold-formed steel sections in MRFs during seismic loads are premature local and distortional buckling, which cause severe damage under strong earthquakes, such as early loss of connection strength, low ductility, and low energy dissipation. This paper clarifies the performance of the CFS section with steel interconnected part (SIP) in moment-resisting frames (MRFs) in many aspects using finite element (FE) procedures. The study summarizes the required dimensions of SIP to achieve optimal behavior for the beam-column connection. Additionally, an advanced connection consisting of SIP and four pairs of out-of-plane stiffeners has been examined. The locations of the out-of-plane stiffeners have been carefully selected to stabilize the connection. A cantilever beam connection has been used to represent an MRF in an advanced way. The connection consists of 2 C channel back-to-back beams connected with a through plate with sixteen bolts. Numerical models have been developed and verified with experimental tests under both monotonic and cyclic loading. The characteristics and creation of the numerical model are well illustrated in this paper. Cyclic loading has been applied according to AISC protocol, which is used to test the performance of the steel connections, as well as to classify the connection according to different design codes. The results show that increasing the plastic moment capacity of the CFS section decreases the required SIP dimensions to achieve optimal behavior by the connection. Additionally, it has been found that using out-of-plane stiffeners in particular locations with SIP increases energy dissipation on average by 74 %. Using stiffeners with SIP can upgrade the classification of the connection from an ordinary or intermediate moment connection to a special moment connection without the need to increase the CFS cross-section area or reduce the slenderness ratio, which in turn reduces the overall costs of construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructuresSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207