Selective and Tunable Absorption of Twisted Light in Achiral and Chiral Plasmonic Metasurfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The symmetry of achiral metasurfaces suggests selective absorption is nonexistent when irradiated either by circularly polarized Gaussian or twisted light beams carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM). In chiral metasurfaces, the lack of symmetry leads to differential absorption when probed with chiral light either in the form of circular polarization (circular dichroism) or helical phase fronts (helical dichroism). Here, we demonstrate differential absorption of asymmetric twisted light beams, known as helical dichroism, which exist in an array and a single achiral structure and can be controlled. When extended to chiral structures, these asymmetrical chiral light modes enable to enhance and tune chiroptical sensitivity. Our technique offers more control parameters than just changing the OAM value, as presented in previous studies. Selective response to asymmetric helical light beams is qualitatively explained in terms of induced multipole moments. The presence of dichroism in achiral nanostructures offers a significant fabrication advantage over complex chiral structures and enables the development of next-generation plasmonic-based chiroptical spectroscopy and molecular sensing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".