Implications of CD154 and Its Receptors in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CD154, also known as CD40 ligand, is a costimulatory molecule involved in humoral and adaptive immune responses upon pairing with its classical receptor, CD40. The CD154/CD40 dyad is a key participant in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In SLE, the major cells at play, T and B lymphocytes, are shown to overexpress CD154 and CD40, respectively. Subsequently, these cells and other CD40-positive cells engage in numerous effector functions contributing to SLE development. With the recent identification of additional receptors for CD154, all belonging to the integrin family, the role of CD154 in SLE is more complex and calls for deeper investigation into its biological significance. Many therapeutic strategies directed against the CD154/CD40 couple have been deployed for the treatment of SLE and proved efficient in animal models and human studies. However, the incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients treated with these anti-CD154/CD40 antibodies halted their further clinical assessments and called for another class of therapies targeting these molecules. Second-generation antibodies directed against CD154 or CD40 are showing promising results in the advanced stages of clinical testing. Our review presents a thorough description of CD154 and its receptors, CD40 and the integrin family members in SLE pathogenesis. All these elements of the CD154 system represent important therapeutic targets for the treatment of SLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".