MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403001228 · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136004

Selective on-site detection and quantification of polystyrene microplastics in water using fluorescence-tagged peptides and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

2024· article· en· W4403001228 on OpenAlexafffund
Abbas Motalebizadeh, Somayeh Fardindoost, Mina Hoorfar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hazardous Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicroplasticsDielectric spectroscopyPolystyreneFluorescenceFluorescence spectroscopyChemistryEnvironmental chemistryElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we developed a method for the on-site selective detection and quantification of microplastics in various water matrices using fluorescence-tagged peptides combined with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Among the types of plastics found in seawater, polystyrene (PS) microplastics were selected. Fluorometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Raman spectroscopy were used to verify the specific interaction of these peptides with PS spherical particles of different sizes (ranging from 0.1 to 250 µm). Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to determine the effects of temperature (25–65 °C), incubation time (5 and 10 min), and particle size on plastic-peptide bonding efficiency, based on fluorescence intensity. For each water type (pure, tap, NaCl (0.5 M), and seawater), EIS plots (Nyquist and Bode) were generated. Significant factors affecting the EIS response, including particle size, shape, and material, were analyzed by measuring electrical parameters for different microplastic concentrations (50 ppb to 20 ppm). The EIS parameters changed with increasing plastic concentration, determining a limit of detection (LOD) of 50 ppb (ng/mL) for pure and tap water and 400 ppb for saline water, as the lowest concentration producing a significant change in EIS parameters compared to the baseline. The sensor proved highly effective for detecting microplastics in low ionic strength environments such as pure and tap water. However, in high ionic strength environments like saline and seawater, the detection capability diminished, likely due to the masking effect of ions on the EIS response. • Developed a method for on-site detection of microplastics using EIS and peptide sensors. • Verified peptide-microplastic interactions using fluorometry, SEM, and Raman spectroscopy. • PCA analyzed the effect of temperature, incubation time, and particle size on bonding efficiency. • Determined detection limits: 50 ppb for pure/tap water, 400 ppb for salty water. • Sensor effective for various microplastics in different water types, despite ionic strength variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hazardous MaterialsSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207