MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403002470 · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126390

National recommendations for adult pneumococcal vaccination in countries of the WHO regions of Americas, Africa, Eastern Mediterranean, South East Asia, and Western Pacific

2024· review· en· W4403002470 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mark A. Fletcher, Jelena Vojicic, Derek Daigle, Bulent Taysi, Hammam Haridy, María Gabriela Abalos, Graciela del Carmen Morales

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsPfizer (Canada)
FundersPfizer
KeywordsGeographyMediterranean climateEast AsiaVaccinationMedicineVirologyChinaArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Adults who are elderly or who have underlying health conditions are at particular risk of Streptococcus pneumoniae infections, and pneumococcal vaccines are available. Nonetheless, only national recommendations from countries of North America and Europe have been previously reviewed in the literature. METHODS: Consequently, we aimed to collate national guidelines for adult pneumococcal immunization across the 161 countries within the World Health Organization (WHO) regions-the Americas (except Canada and the United States of America), Africa, Eastern Mediterranean, South East Asia, and Western Pacific-from country-level official websites and documents, from the WHO portal, and from direct contact with public health officials, pertinent governmental sources, or local vaccination experts. RESULTS: For 40.4 % (65/161) of these countries, adult pneumococcal vaccination information was available. Among these 65 with available information, 63.1 % (41/65) include adult pneumococcal vaccination in the national vaccination schedule: 58.5 % (24/41) recommend vaccination both for older adults and for risk groups, while 9.8 % (4/41) recommend it only for older adults, and 31.7 % (13/41) only for risk groups. Of note, among the 13 national risk based-only recommendations, 30.8 % (4/13) are age-dependent and strictly reserved for older adults. The regions where age-based adult pneumococcal vaccination recommendations seem to predominate are South East Asia, Western Pacific, and the Americas. The threshold for age-based pneumococcal vaccination recommendations varies between 50 and 70 years of age. The Americas has the highest proportion of countries with risk-based recommendations. Three-quarters of these countries include PCV and PPV23 in the recommendations, most often given in sequence. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of countries of the five WHO regions analyzed have accessible information on adult pneumococcal vaccination, and only 25.5 % (41/161) of all countries reviewed recommend adult pneumococcal immunization within the national vaccination schedule. Policymakers should consider extending pneumococcal vaccination guidelines-adapted to national priorities for adult healthcare-as based on local age demographics and risk factor predominance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVaccineSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207