MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403013359 · doi:10.29080/pmhrs.v2i01.2195

PsychoEducation “Quarter Life Crisis : Handling Of The IMM Legal Supremacy Activist

2024· article· en· W4403013359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yusfia Hadisty Bahjatunnufuz, Yuni Nurhamida

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Conference on Psychology Mental Health Religion and Sprirituality · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMental Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoeducationQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceWhite supremacyLawPsychologyPoliticsHistoryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The beginning of adulthood is a phase where a person is searching for their identity, which is often accompanied by challenges, emotional stress, periods of social loneliness, as well as changes in values and adaptation of lifestyle. This condition is called the Quarter Life Crisis (QLC). The Quarter Life Crisis is the anxiety that arises due to the uncertainty about the future. If the QLC is not handled effectively, the emotional crisis has the potential to last for a long time. The purpose of the research was to determine the effect of psychoeducation and Self-Compassion Writing training. The method was carried out by providing psychoeducation in the form of presentations and lectures. The research design used pre-test and post-test. The research was conducted on 15 participants (IMM Supremasi Hukum cadres). The results of the pre-test showed that the participants had a fairly large difference in total score compared to the post-test, where the pre-test Mean result was 21.33 while the post-test Mean result was 78. As for the results of the Self-Compassion Writing training, the Mean value was 88.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Conference on Psychology Mental Health Religion and SpriritualitySame topicMental Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207