MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403013865 · doi:10.29356/jmcs.v68i4.2291

Fifty Years of Molecular Simulations at UAM and in Mexico

2024· article· en· W4403013865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edgar Núñez-Rojas, Alexander Pérez de la Luz, Humberto Saint-Martı́n, José Alejandre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Mexican Chemical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceGeographyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular simulation methods are the bridge between molecular interactions and the macroscopic properties of matter. The equations of statistical mechanics give the probabilistic method of Monte Carlo while those of Newton are the bases of Molecular Dynamics, which is deterministic. A molecular simulation predicts the movement of molecules and hundreds of physicochemical properties can be obtained to understand its behavior at different thermodynamic conditions. The molecular simulation methods were developed in the 1950s in United States of America and in the 1980s in Mexico, where Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM) was a pioneer. It is a multidisciplinary field that involves mathematicians, chemists, physicists, engineers from different disciplines, biologists, computer scientists, etc. Supercomputers have played an important role in its development. Currently, the United States, China and the European Community have everyone more than 100 supercomputers in the TOP500 ranking, while Canada and Brazil have 10, Spain 3, Argentina 1 and Mexico none. These resources allow increasing the training capabilities, the production of research articles, the organization of academic events, etc. In this work, we make a review of the development of molecular simulations at UAM and in Mexico. The diffusion and promotion of this research field has been undertaken by academic leaders from several universities. We have organized 12 Molecular Dynamics Workshops nationwide to teach and put the basic concepts into practice and 13 international Meetings on Molecular Simulations to discuss the state of the art in research projects. The number of articles in molecular dynamics grows exponentially over time; in 2023, more than 250,000 were published worldwide. Mexico contributed 10 % and the UAM 10 % of those published in Mexico. There are more than 32 Mexican leaders living in Mexico who have published around 120 articles with at least 100 citations, according to Web of Science. About 70 % belong to the National System of Researchers at levels III and Emeritus. The research lines range equations of state in liquids, phase equilibrium, development of simulation methods and force fields, polar fluids, electrolytes, colloids, polymers, drug/protein interaction, protein folding, among others. Resumen. Los métodos de simulación molecular son el puente entre las interacciones moleculares y las propiedades macroscópicas de la materia. Las ecuaciones de la mecánica estadística dan el método probabilístico de Montecarlo mientras que las de Newton son las bases de la Dinámica Molecular, que es determinista. Una simulación molecular predice el movimiento de las moléculas y se pueden obtener cientos de propiedades fisicoquímicas para comprender su comportamiento en diferentes condiciones termodinámicas. Los métodos de simulación molecular se desarrollaron en la década de 1950 en Estados Unidos de América y en la década de 1980 en México, donde la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM) fue pionera. Es un campo multidisciplinario que involucra a matemáticos, químicos, físicos, ingenieros de diferentes disciplinas, biólogos, informáticos, etc. Las supercomputadoras han jugado un papel importante en su desarrollo. Actualmente, Estados Unidos, China y la Comunidad Europea cuentan con más de 100 supercomputadoras en el ranking TOP500, mientras que Canadá y Brasil tienen 10, España 3, Argentina 1 y México ninguno. Estos recursos permiten incrementar las capacidades de formación, la producción de artículos de investigación, la organización de eventos académicos, etc. En este trabajo hacemos una revisión del desarrollo de simulaciones moleculares en la UAM y en México. La difusión y promoción de este campo de investigación ha sido llevada a cabo por líderes académicos de varias universidades. Hemos organizado 12 Talleres de Dinámica Molecular a nivel nacional para enseñar y poner en práctica los conceptos básicos y 13 Simposios internacionales sobre Simulación Molecular para discutir el estado del arte en proyectos de investigación. El número de artículos sobre dinámica molecular crece exponencialmente con el tiempo; en 2023, se publicaron más de 250.000 en todo el mundo. México aportó el 10 % y la UAM el 10 % de los publicados en México. Hay más de 32 líderes mexicanos viviendo en México que han publicado alrededor de 120 artículos con al menos 100 citas, según Web of Science. Alrededor del 70 % pertenece al Sistema Nacional de Investigadores en los niveles III y Eméritos. Las líneas de investigación abarcan ecuaciones de estado en líquidos, equilibrio de fases, desarrollo de métodos de simulación y campos de fuerza, fluidos polares, electrolitos, coloides, polímeros, interacción fármaco/proteína, plegamiento de proteínas, entre otras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Mexican Chemical SocietySame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207